<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wager of Death: Why the Bing/Yahoo Merger is Irrelevant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://portcitycolorcopy.com/blog/the-wager-of-death-why-the-bingyahoo-merger-is-irrelevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://portcitycolorcopy.com/blog/the-wager-of-death-why-the-bingyahoo-merger-is-irrelevant/</link>
	<description>Tips and tricks for small business owners.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:26:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jade</title>
		<link>http://portcitycolorcopy.com/blog/the-wager-of-death-why-the-bingyahoo-merger-is-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>Jade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portcitycolorcopy.com/blog/?p=145#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Bing does give search results much like Google but i would have to say that Google still gives more relevant search results</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing does give search results much like Google but i would have to say that Google still gives more relevant search results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acneboy</title>
		<link>http://portcitycolorcopy.com/blog/the-wager-of-death-why-the-bingyahoo-merger-is-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Acneboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 12:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portcitycolorcopy.com/blog/?p=145#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Bing search engine gives almost the same search results as Google. Looks like Google will now have a tough competition when it comes to search engine technology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing search engine gives almost the same search results as Google. Looks like Google will now have a tough competition when it comes to search engine technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://portcitycolorcopy.com/blog/the-wager-of-death-why-the-bingyahoo-merger-is-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-842</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 06:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portcitycolorcopy.com/blog/?p=145#comment-842</guid>
		<description>i have been evaluating the search results of Microsoft Bing compared to Google and they are comparable. Bing gives almost the same relevant search results just like Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have been evaluating the search results of Microsoft Bing compared to Google and they are comparable. Bing gives almost the same relevant search results just like Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melatoninlady</title>
		<link>http://portcitycolorcopy.com/blog/the-wager-of-death-why-the-bingyahoo-merger-is-irrelevant/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>melatoninlady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://portcitycolorcopy.com/blog/?p=145#comment-835</guid>
		<description>Microsoft Bing would be the closet competitor of Google. but i still use Google because it shows more relevant results on the serp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft Bing would be the closet competitor of Google. but i still use Google because it shows more relevant results on the serp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
